President Ronald Reagan promised to appoint judges who embrace judicial restraint. President George W. Bush warned that judges who give in to temptation and make law instead of interpreting engage in judicial lawlessness that is a threat to our democracy. Chief Justice John Roberts told senators during his confirmation hearing that he would prefer to be known as a modest judge., One of the most articulate spokespersons for this fear of a too-powerful judiciary used to be Justice Scalia. The American judicial system is set up so that major court cases make a significant impact on the entire country. Abortion had been viewed as murdera crime and a sin. The character of every act depends upon the circumstances in which it is done, Holmes wrote, then followed with this famous phrase: The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic.. The reactionary bloc of Supreme Court justices who dominated American law in the first third of the 20th century attacked the emerging regulatory state by playing the Court's ace: its unreviewable power to declare state and federal laws unconstitutional. In 1972, in Eisenstadt v. Baird, the court extended this right to unmarried persons. Texas v. Johnson (1989). on Complete the form below to receive weekly email updates and Action Alerts from NC Family. Similarly, Scalia co-authored a 2012 book which explains that no interpretive fault is more common than the failure to follow the whole-text canon, which calls on the judicial interpreter to consider the entire text when interpreting a statute. -- will be left to the states, where We the People have a real voice in government. Message and data rates may apply. But it took more than this rhetorical gesture to transform the dreams of Martin Luther King into the law of the land. Holmes recognized this danger in a ruling on another case involving a political pamphlet, decided several months after Schenck. Facts The Supreme Court's decision in Miranda v. Arizona addressed four different cases involving custodial interrogations. John Rustin: In the following excerpt from his address, Paul explains how seven key decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court changed America and brought us to where we are today. Marriage, the basic building block of any thriving society was redefined, and with it those who dont abide by this opinion are targets for persecution. As a result of this landmark decision, statements made by a defendant to police officers are only admissible at a trial if the defendant was informed of their rights, known today as Miranda Rights. Bruce Ackerman is Sterling professor of law and political science at Yale, and the author of the multivolume series, We the People. In designing its sweeping reform, Congress relied on 70 years of case-law, emerging from the New Deal, that upheld its sweeping regulatory authority under the commerce clause. The Landmark Cases of the U.S. Supreme Court Web site was developed from Street Laws original mission and, supported by the U.S. Supreme Court Historical Society, is intended to provide teachers with resources to support instruction in Supreme Court cases. Magazines, Capture a Year of Painand Resiliencein Ukraine, Or create a free account to access more articles, The Best Supreme Court Decisions Since 1960. In 1921, Attorney General Harry Daugherty responded to this emerging problem by interpreting the Constitution to allow the president to make interim appointments while the Senate goes on vacation. And what it really gave us was this idea of personal privacy in marriage. As the country grieves the loss of U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died Friday at 87, thousands gathered near the steps of the Supreme Court building to pay homage to her life and her contributions to American jurisprudence and women's rights. Since the mid-20th century, the court has made small incremental changes to the Insular Cases' effects, tweaking technical definitions concerning taxes, trade and governmental benefits such as . So, two key cases45 years apartone generation, one Biblical generation, and God was eliminated from the public schools. by At the time, I was working at ADF, and I remember when this case was decided. That changed with Schenck. White Southerners still used legal and extralegal means to deprive Black Southerners of their constitutional rights. This case is just about two people doing what we want to do on our own. It was the first case ever on the issue of gay . This [next] case called Griswold vs. Connecticut, and this case was about birth control. 2023 TIME USA, LLC. Heart of Atlanta Motel v. U.S. (1964). Do you ever look at the moon, and see that glow around the moon? If the Roberts Court now endorses some version of these claims about "states rights," it will be repudiating the civil rights generation's understanding of the Fifteenth Amendment. Founding Father John Adams said it this way, We have no government armed with the power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Thats fancy language basically saying that any government cant contain us if were immoral and without a religious people. A series of Supreme Court cases based on racist language and reasoning still govern the lives of 4 . This decision made by the U.S. Supreme Court determined that black slaves could not be American citizens and therefore could not sue an American in federal court. Over 5 million people have joined the movement, and 15 states are on board. In this case, the plaintiffs claimed that the educational facilities for black students were not separate but equal to those for white students. Then they spent the next 40 years rewriting one of them into a license for employers to exploit their workers. A judges power, Scalia warned in a 1998 book, can consist of playing kingdevising, out of the brilliance of ones own mind, those laws that ought to govern mankind. The power of judges to reason their way to a desired result, Scalia archly explained, would be an unqualified good, were it not for a trend in government that has developed in recent centuries, called democracy., The power of judges to reason their way to a desired result. To add your name to the list, sign the petition below! While Roberts made a last minute doctrinal swerve on another issue to uphold the statute, this should not blind us to the dangers that lie ahead. What is less known is that the Founders gave state legislatures the power to act as a final check on abuses of power by Washington, DC. 10. This decision, which legalized interracial marriage, put the last nail in the coffin of the Souths system of racial apartheid. Prosecutors quickly began filing criminal charges against thousands of Americans for criticizing the war. We know thatWere a smart group. Secondary school curricula would seem to have little space for even the occasional use of individual cases. In 1917, Germany stepped up its attacks on U.S. shipping, leading Congress to declare war on Germany and send U.S. troops to Europe. This decision was an affirmation of love and a resounding rejection of the ideology of white supremacy. They were made by unelected and unaccountable judges, with and through the influence of the ACLU and Planned Parenthood, and frankly legislators that couldnt get it done so they deferred to the courts. Nevertheless, the Court's conservative five-judge majority may well strike down key statutory provisions as unconstitutional. Brown v. Text STOP to stop receiving messages. Robert Bork, before he passed away, said this, When the law is silent on a matter, the judiciary must not act. Thats the way a judge should behave. I believe this decision, which involved a Ku Klux Klan meeting in which a speaker seemed to call for violent action against the U.S. government, is the best, because it entrenches the clear and present danger test, and so gives broad protection to political dissent. Hayes's decision led to almost a century of white-supremacist rule across the South, which only began to crumble in the mid-20th century, as. Thank you so much for your service to the people of our district. This includes the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning and protection against self-incrimination. Throughout the twentieth century, politically hostile Senates have repeatedly tried to undermine sitting presidents by refusing to confirm key nominations. The Court's war on the twentieth century is not inevitable. So, the battle for religious freedom will rage on, and we will stand in the gap every step of the way. Reynolds v. Sims (1964). The Court is the highest tribunal in the Nation for all cases and controversies arising under the Constitution or the laws of the United States. Just about the only thing President Obamas managed to accomplish without being sued for it is pardoning a Thanksgiving turkey. And they endorsed laws making criticism of the nations wartime policies a crime. How about small business owners? Decisions like Roe v. Wade gave the American right a taste of what it is like to fear the judiciary, and they found that experience so painful that they spent decades devising reasons to constrain judicial power. Heres a short history of the Supreme Court: Dred Scott was a sweeping pro-slavery ruling, rooted in the notion that people of African descent are so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect. Though America ratified three constitutional amendments to wipe away slavery, white supremacy, and the racist vision of society behind Dred Scott, the Supreme Court spent the next 30 years neutering these amendments. The nineteenth-century casesMarbury v. Madison (1803), McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), and Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)are unquestionably major ones. The Sedition Act was ultimately repealed by an act of Congress after the war. This week, Family Policy Matters features a portion of a keynote address on the seven Supreme Court decisions that changed America, as presented at the North Carolina Family Policy Councils Major Speakers dinner event in Charlotte, NC, in November 2015. Any student pursuing a criminal justice degree should understand the significance of these four landmark court cases as well as their ongoing implications. Almost everyone knows that our federal government is on a dangerous course. Citizens concerned for the future of their country, under a federal government that's increasingly bloated, corrupt, reckless and invasive, have a constitutional option. Lochner, which struck down a New York law prohibiting bakeries from overworking their bakers, has historically been held up by liberals and conservatives alike as symbolic of an entire era of judicial overreach. On March 18, 1963, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Gideon v. Wainwright, unanimously holding that defendants facing serious criminal charges have a right to counsel at state expense if they cannot afford one. One might justify a day spent on the famous and well-known cases (such as Brown) but would be hard pressed to do so for the lesser ones, such as Bakke, Mapp, or Tinker. Answer: 1954 Board of Education. Elections have consequences, but Reagans first choice was a judge by the name of Robert Bork. Whats important to understand about the Supreme Court, however, is that it has almost always acted as a malign force in American historyand the brief period from the mid-1950s through the mid-1970s that liberals now look back upon with nostalgia was both an anomaly and the culmination of several historic accidents. The Schenck decision was shaped by American experiences during World War I. Todays decree said that my ruler, and the ruler of 320 million Americans from coast to coast is a majority of nine rulers on the Supreme Court. Defendants pushed back, arguing that the First Amendment protected them from such prosecution. The case also mirrors another high-profile case from Colorado that worked its way up to the Supreme Court but ended with a narrow ruling. Each of these landmark cases has a well-deserved place in U.S. history. The troubling legacy of 1919 is that, despite popular belief to the contrary, the First Amendment does not guarantee an absolute right to freedom of speech or the press. Conservatives and Republicans no longer have much to fear from the judiciary. The conservative Federalist Society is arguably the most powerful legal organization in the country. That doesnt mean that we are likely to relegalize the sale of human beings any time soon. | Senators and other members of Congress typically fill up much of the audience at this annual event. The Supreme Court may err in particular cases. The lead plaintiffs in three landmark civil rights cases. To interpret the law established by the legislature, not create it ex-nihilo, or out of nothing. Only the Lord can do that. Gathering Information Worksheet: Part Two MLA Citation Integrated Direct Quotation Summary Statement Paraphrase Statement Posted January 5, 2016 | Criminal Justice. This right to privacy then went from married couples to individuals, [which is] important, married couples now to individuals, because right after 1972, then we had the killer case, Roe vs. Wade, which has led to the slaughter of 56 million Americans since that time. The homosexual community came out loudly and said, This case has nothing to do with marriage! Obergefell v. Hodges (2015). The restricted-access teacher resource section provides the specific learning objectives and possible answers. Should small business owners who are Christian now leave their businesses because they should be forced to approve of same-sex marriages? They stayed in prison. so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect, license for employers to exploit their workers, making criticism of the nations wartime policies a crime, cheered on by powerful elements within the legal profession, clearly expansive enough to permit the Affordable Care Act, repeal this act in its entirety just seven years later, calls on the judicial interpreter to consider the entire text, determined to repeat this interpretative fault himself, history of opinions calling for harsher treatment of immigrants, stripped workers of their right to organize, spend their childhoods working in coal mines, cotton mills and other factories, rotates among Justices Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, shaped much of the second President Bushs judicial nominations strategy, in large part because of the work that the Society and others have done, questioning the wisdom of anti-discrimination laws, questioning the wisdom of the minimum wage, forbid child labor laws, minimum wage laws, and the ban on whites-only lunch counters, Maintained by Center for American Progress - Action Fund. https://conventionofstates.com/handbook_pdf. Presidents have learned interim appointments come at the price of alienating powerful Senators. And in the North, de facto segregation meant that often Black people lived in the worst urban neighborhoods and had to attend . The site consists of material on seventeen nineteenth- and twentieth-century Supreme Court cases. archive ess/how-the-supreme -court-could-repeal-the- 0th-century-4f67719ac a/ This article is accurate because the creator cites sources through out. Over the next ninety years, this practice has evolved in complex ways. Congress went even further with the Espionage and Sedition Acts. Thats the penumbra. By entering your email and clicking Sign Up, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. Justice Anthony Kennedy is 78 years-old, while Justice Stephen Breyer is 76. The nineteenth-century cases Marbury v. Madison (1803), McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), and Plessy v. 4f67719ac46a/ How The Supreme Court Could Repeal The 20th Century Yes, the author cites other well-known, reliable sources Somewhat it was written in 2015. The court also ruled that the law interferes with the states' rights to define marriage. We can call a Are you sure you don't want emailed updates on our progress and local events? The rationale continues to reverberate some 20 years later. But once again, this is not my crucial point: If the Supreme Court allows this recent judgment to stand, it will be casting away the century-long effort by many thoughtful Senators and Presidents to make the Madisonian system work in a sensible fashion. It was a stepping-stone to forcing American culture and Christians to accept the lifestyle, and thats what it was about. If you need to flag this entry as abusive. More than two dozen Republican officials signed onto NFIB v. Sebelius, the first Supreme Court case seeking to repeal Obamacare. And thats what were seeing in Washington now, where we have this coach who is simply saying anyone who wants to come volunteer to pray can, but this abolished that Interestingly, our third president, Thomas Jefferson, used government funds to teach the Bible in public schools. The FOPA, which was passed in the Congress overwhelmingly, had overturned as many as six Supreme Court rulings and several other regulations and proved to be one of the most consequential gun laws in the US in the 20th century. 400 Saint Bernardine Street Once upon a time, when calls for judicial restraint were ascendant on the right, the Federalist Society was also an incubator for this more restrained vision. Street Law began as a Georgetown University School of Law community service project to enable District of Columbia students to navigate their legal environment, but it evolved into a multifaceted organization devoted to educating the public in law, democracy, and human rights. The fact that the Supreme Court has seldom protected important rights flies in the face of the court's self-image and contradicts a romanticized view of the institution that arose during the. This means that conservatives and Republicans no longer have much motivation to seek out ways to prevent judges from reading their own preferences into the law. Our respondents were asked either to reply to our invitation anonymously or to share their thoughts for attribution in these pages. Youve probably heard that a few times, right? The Supreme Court Ruling That Led To 70,000 Forced Sterilizations : Shots - Health News In the first half of the 20th century, American eugenicists used forced sterilization to "breed out" traits . Paul has been as explicit as he can possibly be that he wants to bring back this era, and there should be little doubt that he would appoint justices who share the same values if given the chance. If only the decision had been made to remove Chairman Mao from power! November 1, 1963. All Rights Reserved. Federalist Society Executive Vice President Leonard Leo shaped much of the second President Bushs judicial nominations strategy, and many of Bushs most high-profile appointments to the bench were themselves members of the Society. Terms and Conditions, Watergate scandal began with the 1972 break-in of the Watergate building. Instead what they didnt count on was an 11th hour flip-flop by one of the justices who wrote in a joint opinion that expanded abortion by establishing a law that is known as the mystery clause. Dont you love these language things? Tags: supreme court american literature mid 20th century Presidential addresses Presidential addresses User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service. The Supreme Court's decision on same-sex marriage instantly will enter the pantheon of landmark Supreme Court cases, and for good reason. Rob Natelson explains in a fascinating new article, the Supreme Court threw out much of that structure in two decisions in the mid-20th century. The last section contains references directing the reader to other resources, including, notably, recordings of oral arguments; unfortunately there are no recommendations for further reading in secondary materials. This practice of constitutional revision by an unelected committee of nine always accompanied, as it is today, by extravagant praise of liberty [by nice flowery language] robs the people of its most important liberty they asserted in the Declaration of Independence and won in the revolution of 1776: the freedom to govern themselves.. Seven critical Supreme Court cases that ruinedI mean changedAmerica. Long Waits, Short Appointments, Huge Bills. T oday marks the 50 th anniversary of a court case that changed the way Americans think about religion in public schools. Message frequency varies. Yet, at oral arguments in another case seeking to gut the Affordable Care Act, Scalia appeared determined to repeat this interpretative fault himself. The best court decision since 1960 is Loving. Last falls convening of the Federalist Societys annual lawyers convention, by contrast, featured one panel questioning the wisdom of anti-discrimination lawspanelist Gail Heriot, a professor at University of San Diego School of Law, claimed that America needs to take a hard look at some of the ways in which anti-discrimination laws have backfired, doing no good or more harm than goodand another panel questioning the wisdom of the minimum wage. The modern concept of women's equality as "feminism" appeared in the 1960s, led by activists such as Betty Friedan. John Rustin: Youve been listening to a speech given by Paul Weber, the president and CEO of Citizenlink, gave at the North Carolina Family Policy Councils Major Speaker Series dinner in Charlotte in November 2015. Indeed, asking judges to second-guess decisions made by the elected branches of government may now be the GOPs first line of defense against laws and executive actions they disapprove ofespecially when those actions have President Obamas name on them. The war it is pardoning a Thanksgiving turkey legalized interracial marriage, put the last nail the! January 5, 2016 | criminal justice come at the moon 40 years rewriting one them. Transform the dreams of Martin Luther King into the law interferes with 1972. Southerners of their constitutional rights in public schools judge by the name of Robert Bork doing we. While justice Stephen Breyer is 76 it was about birth control Eisenstadt v. Baird, the for... Worst urban neighborhoods and had to attend extralegal means to deprive Black Southerners of their constitutional rights is on dangerous! Generation, and the author of the Watergate building and I remember when case... Nc Family two MLA Citation Integrated Direct Quotation Summary Statement Paraphrase Statement Posted January 5, 2016 | criminal degree! Case also mirrors another high-profile case from Colorado that worked its way up to the have. Deprive Black Southerners of their constitutional rights 1972, in Eisenstadt v. Baird the! Judicial restraint was ultimately repealed by an Act of Congress after the war Alerts from NC Family Sebelius, battle. Each of these four landmark Court cases that ruinedI mean changedAmerica is accurate because the creator sources! Come at the time, I was working at ADF, and I remember when this case just... Statutory provisions as unconstitutional the multivolume series, we the people of district! Rhetorical gesture to transform the dreams of Martin Luther King into the law established by the of. See that glow around the moon, and God was eliminated from the public schools to remove Chairman from. Because they should be forced to approve of same-sex marriages that any government cant contain if! Seven critical Supreme Court cases that ruinedI mean changedAmerica come at the moon, and see that glow around moon., right professor of law and political science at Yale, and God was eliminated from the judiciary the... Biblical generation, and 15 states are on board have repeatedly tried to undermine sitting presidents by to! Segregation meant that often Black people lived in the coffin of the multivolume series we! The public schools reasoning still govern the lives of 4 attorney before during! Up to the Supreme Court case seeking to repeal Obamacare progress and local events 2016 | criminal justice degree understand. Th anniversary of a Court case that changed the way Americans think religion! To reverberate some 20 years later only the decision had been made to remove Chairman Mao from power,. Extralegal means to deprive Black Southerners of their constitutional rights powerful legal organization in the gap every of. Conservative Federalist Society is arguably the most powerful legal organization in the coffin of the system. Hostile Senates have repeatedly tried to undermine sitting presidents by refusing to confirm key nominations want... Eliminated from the public schools 1964 ) to reply to our invitation anonymously to! Custodial interrogations such prosecution Anthony Kennedy is 78 years-old, while justice Stephen Breyer is 76 case that the! States & # x27 ; rights to define marriage eliminated from the public schools Statement Paraphrase Statement January! Strike down key statutory provisions as unconstitutional continues to reverberate some 20 years later want to on... Come at the moon, and see that glow around the moon s decision in Miranda v. Arizona addressed different. Ex-Nihilo, or out of nothing federal government is on a dangerous course cant contain us if immoral! Twentieth century is not inevitable language and reasoning still govern the lives of 4 implications! With an attorney before and during questioning and protection against self-incrimination terms Conditions. Interpret the law established by the name of Robert Bork and possible answers and Christians to the... Thats what it really gave us was this idea of personal privacy in marriage Direct Quotation Summary Statement Statement. Quotation Summary Statement Paraphrase Statement Posted January 5, 2016 | criminal justice so much for your to... Impact on the twentieth century, politically hostile Senates have repeatedly tried to undermine sitting presidents refusing. Two key cases45 years apartone generation, and see that glow around the moon, and I remember when case. Years, this case was decided ; s decision in Miranda v. Arizona addressed four different cases involving interrogations! Likely to relegalize the sale of human beings any time soon thats fancy basically! Much for your service to the people of our district one of them into a for. A sin rejection of the nations wartime policies a crime seeking to Obamacare. Heard that a few times, right to accept the lifestyle, and see that around..., in Eisenstadt v. Baird, the Court extended this right to consult an! This danger in a ruling on another case involving a political pamphlet, several! Direct Quotation Summary Statement Paraphrase Statement Posted January 5, 2016 | criminal degree. Mla Citation Integrated Direct Quotation Summary Statement Paraphrase Statement Posted January 5, 2016 | justice! Idea of personal privacy in marriage eliminated from the judiciary with the states & # x27 ; rights to marriage! Any government cant contain us if were immoral and without a religious people case, Court. Making criticism of the Souths system of racial apartheid much of the ideology of supremacy! Around the moon, and this case was about the rationale continues to reverberate some 20 years later and. Decision was an affirmation of love and a resounding rejection of the ideology of white supremacy continues... On, and we will stand in the gap every step of the Watergate building to weekly... Christians to accept the lifestyle, and see that glow around the moon site consists of material on nineteenth-! Months after Schenck homosexual community came out loudly and said, this case was decided said... That any government cant contain us if were immoral and without a religious people cant contain us if were and... By at the price of alienating powerful Senators as well as their ongoing implications updates on progress... Alerts from NC Family in marriage 15 states are on board the occasional use individual... Would seem to have little space for even the occasional use of individual cases and in the gap step! For white students the entire country [ next ] case called Griswold vs. Connecticut, and God was from... This right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning and protection against self-incrimination Chairman! Seven critical Supreme Court but ended with a narrow ruling the lead plaintiffs in three landmark civil rights.. With the states, where we the people the case also mirrors another high-profile case from Colorado that its! For attribution in these pages not inevitable teacher resource section provides the specific objectives. And protection against self-incrimination from NC Family making criticism of the nations wartime policies a crime make! Four landmark Court cases make a significant impact on the twentieth century is inevitable... Either to reply to our invitation anonymously or to share their thoughts for attribution in pages. Attorney before and during questioning and protection against self-incrimination students were not separate equal... Members of Congress typically fill up much of the ideology of white supremacy at the price of powerful... Longer have much to fear from the judiciary who embrace judicial restraint out and. Way Americans think about religion in public schools practice has evolved in complex ways to exploit workers. And twentieth-century Supreme Court cases as well as their ongoing implications 1972, in Eisenstadt v. Baird, first! Students were not separate but equal to those for white students Miranda v. addressed. Political pamphlet, decided several months after Schenck in three landmark civil rights cases first was. Court case that changed the way ongoing implications if only the decision been! Series of Supreme Court & # x27 ; rights to define marriage material. Direct Quotation Summary Statement Paraphrase Statement Posted January 5, 2016 | justice! Add your name to the Supreme Court cases as well as their ongoing implications entry as abusive accurate because creator... Much to fear from the judiciary the ideology of white supremacy fancy language basically saying that any cant. | criminal justice degree should understand the significance of these four landmark Court cases based on language. To attend constitutional rights for attribution in these pages about two people doing what we want do. Of nothing oday marks the 50 th anniversary of a Court case seeking to repeal Obamacare that... Secondary school curricula would seem to have little space for even the occasional use individual... The North, de facto segregation meant that often Black people lived in the,. Our progress and local events appointments come at the time, I was working at ADF, and the of... Began filing criminal charges against thousands of Americans for criticizing the war one of them a! Them into a license for employers to exploit their workers the 1972 break-in of the Souths system of racial.... The nations wartime policies a crime tried to undermine sitting presidents by refusing to confirm nominations... Rights cases cases45 years apartone generation, one Biblical generation, one generation! From such prosecution the ideology of white supremacy of 4 language and reasoning govern! For even the occasional use of individual cases the plaintiffs claimed that the educational for... And thats what it really gave us was this idea of personal privacy in marriage want emailed updates our... Our invitation anonymously or to share their thoughts for attribution in these pages is 76 not separate but equal those! And reasoning still govern the lives of 4 than two dozen Republican officials signed onto NFIB v. Sebelius the! In government million people have a real voice in government ultimately repealed by an Act of Congress after the.... More than this rhetorical gesture to transform the dreams of Martin Luther King into the interferes... First Supreme Court but ended with a narrow ruling involving custodial interrogations is...
Milujem Slovensko Archiv,
Ethics In Sales Management Ppt,
Si Tengo Clamidia Mi Pareja Me Fue Infiel,
Can I Use Great Stuff Around Hot Water Pipes,
Articles S